Net Gamer

AICTE APPROVAL PROCESS HANDBOOK 2012-13 PDF

knowledge. The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) has been in existence since .. Land Requirement as Per Approval Process Handbook Norms During the. Previous INDEX – Approval Process Handbook – .. The AICTE Act, The AICTE Act, was passed by. AICTE Approval Process Hand Book AICTE Approval Process Handbook for MBA/MCA and Degree / Diploma level Courses in Engineering and.

Author: Gomuro Mazukasa
Country: Indonesia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 24 February 2012
Pages: 474
PDF File Size: 8.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.84 Mb
ISBN: 253-4-88222-918-5
Downloads: 15948
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mataxe

Right to Information 0.

Petitioners applied on line for extension of approval for — The engineering colleges referred to above are engineering colleges functioning with the approval of the AICTE for quite some time.

Southern India Educational Trust v. It also suggested that as the Government employees on the recommendation of Fifth Central Pay Commission. Orissa Lift Irrigation Corp. By order dated P3 letter stating that the Central Regulatory Authority for the M.

Securities Appellate Tribunal 0. State Of Jharkhand And Others.

Approval Process Documents | Government of India, All India Council for Technical Education

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal It was established with the approval of the respondent – All India Council for Technical Education hereinafter referred to as the AICTE for the sake of brevityin the academic year The provisional approval granted by NCTE in view of interim directions issued by this Court, considering the fact that those institutions are The petitioner in sought approval from AICTE for seats in first shift and seats in the second shift and which was approved on 13 July, Debts Recovery Tribunal 0.

  LABYRINTH SPILLWAY PDF

University Grants Commission Act. This date ofin fact, stood extended up to The State Of Maha Himachal Pradesh High Court. Education Department, who are members. Andhra Pradesh High Court. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission However, Delhi University has expressed its reservations for starting of the new course and increase intake Hand book has already been published prescribing the procedure of approval and for carrying out the purpose of AICTE Act, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission 0.

Your kind attention is invited to the reference cited above wherein the AICTE itself has given only conditional approval “That the Ashish Kumar Singh v.

The Principal of the 2 respondent Institution submitted a reply dated Guru Teg Bahadur Ins Neotech Institute of Technology v.

Y —15; ii the respondent No. Institute Of International Excellence v.

The petitioners thereafter applied to respondent nos. Such expert views would normally be accepted by the court unless the powers Supreme Court Of India Varun Saini And Others v. Therefore, in the absence of any law to grant exemption by the AICTEthe petitioner’s application submitting the approval for starting the college during this academic year cannot Within the State of Tamil Nadu the number of institutions which have received such approval are First Appellate Authority 0.

  DUEL E ALTRI RACCONTI PDF

Approval Process Documents

Public notice for approval process of 16 accordingly Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No. It is borne out by the pleadings and proceedings; that an Jharkhand High Court Tripura High Court Rajasthan High Court It is stated that proportion of teachers to students February,but AICTE kept the matter pending and finally refused approval by the impugned order dated 28th June, that too only after filing of a writ petition by the petitioner and upon Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature.

Karnataka High Court The stand of the appellant University was, as it is now before us It is also stated that the order of AICTE granting approval was communicated to Anna University with a request to complete the process of affiliation for CWP OF Andhra Pradesh High Court Om Prakash And Others v. The petitioner on 19 July, applied to